0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Á¦Á¶¾÷ ±Ù·ÎÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ºÆ®·¹½º ´ëóÇൿ ÃøÁ¤µµ±¸ °³¹ß

Development of Stress Coping Behaviors Measurement Scale for Korean Workers

»ê¾÷°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2007³â 16±Ç 1È£ p.48 ~ 57
KMID : 0384920070160010048
Á¤Áø¿í ( Jeong Jin-Wook ) - Çѱ¹»ê¾÷¾ÈÀü°ø´Ü »ê¾÷¾ÈÀüº¸°Ç¿¬±¸¿ø

±è±â¿õ ( Kim Ki-Woong ) - Çѱ¹»ê¾÷¾ÈÀü°ø´Ü »ê¾÷¾ÈÀüº¸°Ç¿¬±¸¿ø
Çã°æÈ­ ( Heo Kyung-Hwa ) - Çѱ¹»ê¾÷¾ÈÀü°ø´Ü »ê¾÷¾ÈÀüº¸°Ç¿¬±¸¿ø

Abstract

Purpose: To develop the stress coping behavior measurement scale(SCBMS) for the workers in manufacturing industry.

Methods: Developing of SCBMS was based on job stress and psycho-social health status. Job stress and psycho-social health status were estimated by using the Karasek¡¯s job content questionnaire (JCQ) and the general health questionnaire (GHQ-28), and the general characteristics for subjects were estimated by self-reported questionnaire and interview.

Result: The subjects were 456 male workers who had never been occupationally exposed to hazardous chemical and other materials, was mean age 31.27 years and mean work duration was 4.81 years. As a result of factor analysis for developed stress coping questionnaire, four factors were extracted such as inactive, active, health and emotional behavior from 15 question items of stress coping questionnaire. Fifteen items passed for item internal consistency (100% success rate) and item discriminant validity (100% success rate). Cronbach¡¯s alpha coefficient for each factor ranged from 0.56 to 0.77. The active behavior correlated positively with job demand of JCQ (r=0.12, p<0.05), but total GHQ-28 was negatively correlation (r=-0.24, p<0.01), respectively.

Conclusion: These results demonstrated the reliability and validity of SCBMS. Thus, the results may prove to be a useful assessment tool in evaluating stress coping behavior.
KeyWords
Á¦Á¶¾÷ ±Ù·ÎÀÚ, ½ºÆ®·¹½º ´ëóÇൿ, ÃøÁ¤µµ±¸
Manufacturing industry workers, Stress coping measurement scale, JCQ, GHQ
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)